Hedge Funds Similar to PIPER SANDLER

13F Portfolio OverlapQ2 2026PIPER SANDLER portfolio →
Institutional-grade research for retail investors

Most similar hedge funds by 13F overlap

PIPER SANDLER & CO. is an institutional investor managing $135M across 19 U.S. equity positions as of Q2 2026. Based on the overlap of conviction holdings in their latest 13F filings, the hedge funds with portfolios most similar to PIPER SANDLER are Elequin Securities, CORBYN INVESTMENT, DeepCurrents Investment Group, with shared positions in $LITE, $AEIS, $APO, $MGPI, $BXMT, $ZD. The full ranking of 20 similar funds is below.

Substantial overlap · 3 shared positions
$3.4B
693 positions
Notable overlap · 4 shared positions
$346M
66 positions
Some overlap · 4 shared positions
$3.3B
143 positions
Some overlap · 5 shared positions
$7.1B
549 positions
Some overlap · 4 shared positions
$5.1B
427 positions
Some overlap · 3 shared positions
$964M
23 positions
Some overlap · 3 shared positions
$2.1B
240 positions
Some overlap · 3 shared positions
$3.4B
73 positions
Some overlap · 3 shared positions
$389M
43 positions
Some overlap · 4 shared positions
$7.2B
145 positions
Some overlap · 5 shared positions
$1.3B
43 positions
Some overlap · 3 shared positions
$3.0B
108 positions
Slight overlap · 3 shared positions
$303M
148 positions
Slight overlap · 3 shared positions
$7.7B
788 positions
Slight overlap · 3 shared positions
$1.2B
54 positions
Slight overlap · 3 shared positions
$2.1B
231 positions
Slight overlap · 4 shared positions
$4.5B
236 positions
Slight overlap · 3 shared positions
$899M
1,449 positions
Slight overlap · 3 shared positions
$34.8B
55 positions
Slight overlap · 5 shared positions
$2.1B
94 positions

Compare PIPER SANDLER’s portfolio side by side

See the exact shared positions, conviction overlap, sector alignment, and where these funds diverge — and run the same analysis on any of 8,700+ institutions.

View PIPER SANDLER’s holdings

Similarity is derived from each fund’s latest 13F-HR filing with the SEC. Funds are ranked by the overlap of distinctive conviction holdings; near-universal mega-cap positions are excluded so the ranking reflects shared strategy, not common index exposure. Data is informational only and not investment advice.