Hedge Funds Similar to Darwins River

13F Portfolio OverlapQ2 2026Darwins River portfolio →
Institutional-grade research for retail investors

Most similar hedge funds by 13F overlap

Darwins River Capital, LP is an institutional investor managing $182M across 26 U.S. equity positions as of Q2 2026. Based on the overlap of conviction holdings in their latest 13F filings, the hedge funds with portfolios most similar to Darwins River are MANE GLOBAL, AlpenGlobal, Glassy Mountain Advisors, with shared positions in $ARMK, $CMG, $ONON, $WSM, $BKNG, $HSY. The full ranking of 19 similar funds is below.

Notable overlap · 3 shared positions
$1.2B
54 positions
Notable overlap · 4 shared positions
$156M
35 positions
Notable overlap · 3 shared positions
$366M
76 positions
Some overlap · 3 shared positions
$246M
32 positions
Some overlap · 3 shared positions
$1.4B
64 positions
Some overlap · 4 shared positions
$161M
43 positions
Some overlap · 3 shared positions
$417M
96 positions
Some overlap · 3 shared positions
$219M
196 positions
Some overlap · 3 shared positions
$135M
80 positions
Some overlap · 3 shared positions
$300M
47 positions
Some overlap · 3 shared positions
$313M
85 positions
Some overlap · 4 shared positions
$482M
235 positions
Some overlap · 3 shared positions
$883M
211 positions
Slight overlap · 3 shared positions
$401M
121 positions
Slight overlap · 3 shared positions
$1.0B
212 positions
Slight overlap · 4 shared positions
$603M
47 positions
Slight overlap · 3 shared positions
$285M
125 positions
Slight overlap · 3 shared positions
$150M
332 positions
Slight overlap · 3 shared positions
$211M
20 positions

Compare Darwins River’s portfolio side by side

See the exact shared positions, conviction overlap, sector alignment, and where these funds diverge — and run the same analysis on any of 8,700+ institutions.

View Darwins River’s holdings

Similarity is derived from each fund’s latest 13F-HR filing with the SEC. Funds are ranked by the overlap of distinctive conviction holdings; near-universal mega-cap positions are excluded so the ranking reflects shared strategy, not common index exposure. Data is informational only and not investment advice.