RiverNorth Opportunistic Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (RMI) — Institutional Holders, Q2 2026
24 institutional investment managers reported a RMI position on SEC Form 13F-HR for the quarter ended June 30, 2026, with a combined reported value of $20.9M. Every filer is listed below, ranked by position value. Put and call option positions are excluded, and a firm filing several lots or share classes is shown once with its total.
RMI in Q2 2026: what funds did
Funds that filed a 13F for both Q1 2026 and Q2 2026, by what they did with the common stock. Share counts are adjusted for any split between the two quarters; dollar figures are the change in shares at this quarter’s price.
Biggest buyers
- GUGGENHEIM CAPITALAdded · +90,096 sh+$1.4M
- OSAICAdded · +12,898 sh+$199.8K
- ENVESTNET ASSET MANAGEMENTAdded · +5,099 sh+$79.0K
- Clear Street GroupNew · +4,353 sh+$67.4K
- BANK OF AMERICAAdded · +1,191 sh+$18.4K
Biggest sellers
- Gateway Wealth PartnersTrimmed · -53,093 sh-$822.4K
- Rockefeller Capital Management L.P.Trimmed · -15,600 sh-$241.6K
- CITADEL ADVISORSSold out · -12,129 sh-$187.9K
- Janney Montgomery ScottSold out · -11,309 sh-$175.2K
- XML FinancialSold out · -10,000 sh-$154.9K
RMI 13F holders ranked 1–24 of 24
| # | Institution | Shares | Value | % of portfolio | QoQShares vs Q1 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MORGAN STANLEY#1 · 229,113 sh | 229,113 | $3.5M | <0.01% | -3.6% |
| 2 | ROBINSON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT#2 · 143,791 sh | 143,791 | $2.2M | 0.98% | -6.0% |
| 3 | WELLS FARGO & COMPANY#3 · 142,960 sh | 142,960 | $2.2M | <0.01% | -2.5% |
| 4 | GUGGENHEIM CAPITAL#4 · 140,755 sh | 140,755 | $2.2M | 0.01% | +177.8% |
| 5 | Rockefeller Capital Management L.P.#5 · 96,200 sh | 96,200 | $1.5M | <0.01% | -14.0% |
| 6 | ROYAL BANK OF CANADA#6 · 87,333 sh | 87,333 | $1.4M | <0.01% | -6.9% |
| 7 | UBS Group AG#7 · 84,326 sh | 84,326 | $1.3M | <0.01% | -7.4% |
| 8 | Gateway Wealth Partners#8 · 53,143 sh | 53,143 | $823.2K | 0.05% | -50.0% |
| 9 | ENVESTNET ASSET MANAGEMENT#9 · 47,860 sh | 47,860 | $741.4K | <0.01% | +11.9% |
| 10 | OSAIC#10 · 47,135 sh | 47,135 | $730.1K | <0.01% | +37.7% |
| 11 | Concurrent Investment Advisors#11 · 41,120 sh | 41,120 | $636.9K | — | 0.0% |
| 12 | LPL Financial#12 · 40,780 sh | 40,780 | $631.7K | <0.01% | +1.5% |
| 13 | BANK OF AMERICA#13 · 40,602 sh | 40,602 | $628.9K | 0.00% | +3.0% |
| 14 | Cypress Wealth Services#14 · 32,500 sh | 32,500 | $503.4K | — | 0.0% |
| 15 | Noble Wealth Management PBC#15 · 28,007 sh | 28,007 | $433.8K | — | -1.7% |
| 16 | Plancorp#16 · 21,069 sh | 21,069 | $330.2K | <0.01% | 0.0% |
| 17 | River Street Advisors#17 · 20,593 sh | 20,593 | $319.0K | — | 0.0% |
| 18 | Apollon Wealth Management#18 · 19,535 sh | 19,535 | $302.6K | — | 0.0% |
| 19 | STIFEL FINANCIAL#19 · 12,767 sh | 12,767 | $197.8K | <0.01% | -1.3% |
| 20 | RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL#20 · 12,088 sh | 12,088 | $187.2K | <0.01% | 0.0% |
| 21 | Clear Street Group#21 · 4,353 sh | 4,353 | $67.4K | <0.01% | New |
| 22 | Ritter Daniher Financial Advisory / DE#22 · 452 sh | 452 | $7.0K | <0.01% | +1.8% |
| 23 | INTERNATIONAL ASSETS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT#23 · 295 sh | 295 | $4.6K | <0.01% | New |
| 24 | HIGHLINE WEALTH PARTNERS#24 · 250 sh | 250 | $3.9K | — | 0.0% |
Funds that sold out of RMI in Q2 2026 (3)
Held RMI at the end of Q1 2026 and filed a Q2 2026 13F without it. Not in the list above, because they no longer hold it. Largest prior position first.
| Institution | Shares sold | Value in Q1 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| CITADEL ADVISORS12,129 sh | 12,129 | $182.7K |
| Janney Montgomery Scott11,309 sh | 11,309 | $170.0K |
| XML Financial10,000 sh | 10,000 | $150.6K |
Source: Form 13F-HR filings on SEC EDGAR, Q2 2026. Values are as reported by each manager at quarter end. “% of portfolio” is the position’s share of the manager’s total reported 13F value for the same quarter. “New” means the manager filed a 13F for Q1 2026 without this position; a dash means no comparison is available. Where a manager’s own filing is internally inconsistent its value is withheld and it is listed last. 13F data shows reported holdings, not recommendations.