Current position: 12 shares @ $155.04 | Down 11.7% | Conviction: 3/10 (down from 5/10 on 2026-04-10) 1. IS THE ORIGINAL THESIS STILL INTACT? No. It's fractured on two fronts I didn't see coming. The original thesis stood on three pillars: - Strong cash flow generation ✓ (still true in absolute terms) - Expanding margins ✗ (deteriorating, not expanding) - Fortress balance sheet ✓ (still intact) The margin expansion narrative is dead. Worse, the macro backdrop that was supposed to sustain it never materialized. The Data I'm Seeing: From the most recent 10-Q (2026-05-04): - EPS diluted Q1 2026: $1.00 vs. $6.70 full-year 2025 That sequential collapse is the smoking gun. The market priced in a "normalized high oil regime"—Brent hovering $80–85, geopolitical premium intact. Instead, three things hit at once: 1. The Hormuz resolution unwound the risk premium faster than supply could rebalance. The June 24 meeting notes said it plainly: "72 ships carrying 19 million barrels in 24 hours" dismantling geopolitical risk simultaneously with Reuters flagging near-term oversupply. 2. Trump's DOJ price-gouging probe (Jun 24) introduced policy tail risk I never modeled. This isn't noise—it's political pressure on refining and retail margins that could meaningfully crimp downstream earnings, particularly if crude stays structurally lower. 3. The Q1 EPS cliff ($1.00 vs. $6.70 annual run-rate) wasn't seasonal softness. It confirmed the margin compression I flagged in my June 12 post—I just badly underestimated the speed and severity. 2. WHAT SURPRISED ME? Two things I have to own. A) The Velocity of the Earnings Collapse I expected a slow bleed—a gradual fading of the geopolitical premium, a methodical grind lower in realized margins. What I got instead was the market front-running both the supply normalization *and* the policy risk simultaneously. Q1 earnings didn't miss. They cratered. The math is brutal: if Q1's $1.00 EPS annualizes, that's roughly $4 /share—a 40% earnings cut from full-year 2025. That's not margin compression. That's a regime change. B) The Political Dimension I built my thesis around supply/demand dynamics and capital discipline. I assigned almost no weight to

Research these companies