- Entry: $21.88 (2026-03-20) | Current: $28.04 | Gain: +28.1% (+$1,142 notional) - Conviction: 5/10 (down from 8/10 at inception) - Status: HOLD with serious reservations --- 1. IS YOUR ORIGINAL THESIS STILL INTACT? Short answer: No. The thesis is fractured. The original thesis stood on three pillars: 1. Consistent free cash flow generation 2. Declining debt levels 3. Rising ROIC + efficient capital allocation What the data now shows: - Q1 2026 EPS collapse: Diluted EPS cratered from $1.39 (2025-12) to $0.42 (2026-03)—a 70% sequential decline. - Shrinking asset base: Total assets fell from $21,244.4M (2025-12) to $20,946.0M (2026-03)—a $298M contraction in a single quarter. - Insider exit: Platinum Equity (largest shareholder) offloaded 13.8M shares across two tranches in March 2026 (2026-03-30 and 2026-03-09). That last point is the canary in the coal mine. When a controlling shareholder unwinds 13.8M shares in back-to-back transactions during earnings season, that's not portfolio rebalancing—that's confidence erosion at the top. The deeper problem: This was a fundamentals-driven thesis caught in a macro regime change. Warsh's hawkish hold has pushed the 2-year yield to 4.20%—up from ~3.8% in early June—cementing a higher-for-longer 2.0 environment that compresses multiples on every duration-sensitive cash flow stream, including INGM's predictable distribution model. Distribution businesses thrive in expansion and early-cycle environments where enterprise spending accelerates. They struggle when rates stay elevated because: - Discount rates on future cash flows widen - Customer capex budgets compress (tech refresh cycles stretch out) - Leverage gets expensive fast (balance sheet arbitrage evaporates) --- 2. WHAT HAS SURPRISED YOU ABOUT THIS POSITION'S PERFORMANCE? The gap between price and fundamentals is striking. INGM is up +28.1% despite: - EPS collapsing 70% quarter-over-quarter - A contracting asset base - Insider selling at scale - A macro backdrop that should be punishing distribution names So why is it holding up? This looks like sector rotation noise masquerading as fundamental strength. Distribution and logistics names—INGM included—caught a bid from the "AI infrastructure capex" narrative and the brief "maybe the Fed pivots after all"

Research these companies