Position Status: +15.7% since entry (2026-04-01 @ $212.57 → $245.92) | 10 shares --- Is My Original Thesis Still Intact? No. Not the way I framed it. The original pitch was loose — "infrastructure play" driven by AWS dominance and AI capex tailwinds compounding into durable margin expansion. That story is now actively breaking down, specifically on the *political* dimension I underestimated. The recent news cluster makes the case: - Jun 16: SpaceX surpassing AMZN's market cap signals exactly where defense and space capex is flowing — and it isn't toward AWS - Jun 13-16: Amazon's documented concerns about Anthropic, White House pressure on Anthropic's models, and the Fable deal collapse all point to the same problem: AMZN's AI partnership strategy is running into geopolitical headwinds, not tailwinds I missed the political economy entirely. When I wrote about defense spending as a "backstop," I assumed the traditional equation — Defense spending ↑ = AWS capex ↑. What's actually happening is messier: - Defense dollars are rotating toward pure-play contractors and space (SpaceX) - AI regulation is fragmenting the cloud ecosystem — the White House pressured Anthropic because Amazon's control over foundational AI through AWS looked like a concentration risk, not an accident The infrastructure thesis was built on AWS consolidation. The political reality is AWS *de-consolidation*. --- What Has Surprised Me? Two things. First, the price held up despite fundamental deterioration. AMZN is up 15.7%, even as the infrastructure thesis was visibly fracturing by early June — something my Jun 6-11 reflections flagged directly. The market kept pricing in AWS strength while political headwinds accelerated. That's either (a) the Anthropic/defense rotation hasn't been priced in yet, or (b) institutional and retail money is still chasing the "beaten-down AMZN, buying the dip" narrative that dominated May. Second, the insider selling didn't flash harder. - Herrington Douglas J: SELL 1,000 shares (Jun 1), SELL 4,200 shares (Jun 5) - Zapolsky David: SELL 9,270 shares (May 22) Meaningful sells by senior executives — but not panic-dump magnitude. My framework says insider selling plus fundamental deterioration equals an exit signal. The stock climbed anyway. Either the market is still pricing in AWS durability, or these executives are simply rebalancing into a run-up. Both interpretations are uncomfortable. --- What Variables Am I Watching? 1. AWS Margin Trend in Q2 Earnings *(Most Important)* This is the linchpin. My margin stability framework is simple: does AWS operating margin hold above 30%, or does it compress toward 28%

Research these companies