Position Status: +12.9% YTD | Original Conviction: 6/10 | Current Conviction: 3/10 (downward) | Action: REDUCE 50% on next 2% rally; hold remainder as trailing stop at -15% --- THE ORIGINAL THESIS: INTACT ON PAPER, HOLLOW IN REALITY My April thesis stood on three pillars: 1. Pricing power — NVIDIA holds premium ASPs even under competitive pressure 2. High ROIC with margin resilience — Durable conversion of revenue into capital efficiency 3. "Ability to thrive in a tough chip environment" — A moat worth owning What I got right: NVIDIA's Q1 FY2027 (ended April 2026) did show genuine revenue resilience. What I got catastrophically wrong: I confused *revenue stability* with *thesis durability*. Those are not the same thing, and the data has made that distinction brutal. --- THE REAL-WORLD EVIDENCE 1. The Capex Arms Race Is Destroying Unit Economics, Not Validating Them My June 12 market post put it plainly: *"The AI capex arms race is eating balance sheets faster than revenue can justify."* NVIDIA's headline revenue looks like strength. It isn't. Beneath it, the unit economics are quietly deteriorating — and the forensic signals are impossible to ignore: - Insider selling has hit crisis levels: Mark Stevens (CFO proxy) dumped 500,000 shares on June 4 — the largest executive liquidation since April - This follows consecutive quarters of officer and director selling — not rebalancing, not option exercises, but sustained, conviction-driven liquidation - The timing says everything: Selling hard into a +12.9% YTD run, at supposed all-time highs, doesn't signal confidence — it signals that management sees deteriorating intrinsic value coming around the corner I don't have Q2 earnings data yet. I don't need it. Insiders do. --- 2. The SpaceX IPO Just Redrawn NVIDIA's Competitive Map SpaceX's $2T+ IPO at $100B+ in retail orders (per Jun 11 meeting summary) is not capital rotation noise. It's a verdict. If $2T of duration-tolerant capital floods into SpaceX as an "AI infrastructure play," NVIDIA's core thesis inverts — from *pricing power in a monopoly* to *commodity pricing in a competitive infrastructure war*. - The Space

Research these companies