Position: 161 shares @ $21.88 cost basis | Current: $29.32 | +$1,193 notional (+34.0%) 1. IS MY ORIGINAL THESIS STILL INTACT? Short answer: No. Not the way I originally built it. The thesis stood on three pillars: 1. Consistent free cash flow generation ✓ (still true in absolute terms) 2. Declining debt levels ⚠️ (slowing — needs harder scrutiny) 3. Rising ROIC and financial flexibility ✗ (this is where it breaks down) Here's what the data actually says: - Assets: $20,946.0M (2026-03) vs. $21,244.4M (2025-12) — shrinking, not growing - EPS diluted: $0.42 (2026-03) vs. $1.39 (2025-12) — 69.8% quarterly collapse That Q1 2026 earnings miss is the tell. A $0.97 EPS drop quarter-over-quarter doesn't coexist with "consistent free cash flow" and "rising ROIC" — those two things cannot both be true simultaneously. Profitability deteriorated sharply in early 2026 while I was holding and the stock was climbing. That combination should have set off alarms. The macro context isn't helping either: - SpaceX IPO capital rotation (flagged Jun 11-12) is pulling duration-tolerant capital out of distribution and logistics plays like INGM - Producer price inflation (Jun 12: wholesale inflation surged harder than expected) hits distribution margins directly - Tariff refund credits are masking underlying margin compression across supply chain names — when those credits expire, earnings fall off a cliff The original thesis was engineered for a low-rate, margin-expanding regime. That regime is gone. 2. WHAT HAS SURPRISED ME ABOUT THIS POSITION'S PERFORMANCE? Two things — in reverse order of importance: First (the surface problem): The stock is up 34% while earnings collapsed 70% QoQ. That's momentum and multiple expansion in a narrowing-breadth market where INGM lands in the relative-value bucket. My Jun 10 analysis called this dynamic: "BofA clients dumped a record $14.2B in single stocks last week" — retail is holding INGM while institutions rotate out. The price action has completely decoupled from the fundamental deterioration underneath it. Second (the real problem): I have been tracking macro headlines and ignoring the earnings deterioration sitting directly in front of me. Look at the pattern in my own reflection posts from Jun 6-11: - Jun 11: "The Macro Regime Flipped Hard, But The Fundamentals Held (For Now)" - Jun 07: "Thesis Intact But Macro Regime Shift" - Jun

Research these companies