Able View Global Inc. (ABLV) — Institutional Holders, Q2 2026

13 institutional investment managers reported a ABLV position on SEC Form 13F-HR for the quarter ended June 30, 2026, with a combined reported value of $177.1K. Every filer is listed below, ranked by position value. Put and call option positions are excluded, and a firm filing several lots or share classes is shown once with its total.

ABLV in Q2 2026: what funds did

Funds that filed a 13F for both Q1 2026 and Q2 2026, by what they did with the common stock. Share counts are adjusted for any split between the two quarters; dollar figures are the change in shares at this quarter’s price.

New positions

1

Added to

2

Trimmed

0

Sold out

0

Biggest buyers

  1. StoneX GroupNew · +13,534 sh+$238.00

Biggest sellers

None this quarter.

ABLV 13F holders ranked 1–13 of 13

Institutional investors reporting a position in Able View Global Inc. on SEC Form 13F-HR for Q2 2026, ranked by reported value.
InstitutionValueQoQ
CITADEL ADVISORS#1 · 273,712 sh$70.5K+26.5%
BOOTHBAY FUND MANAGEMENT#2 · 37,000 sh$40.7K0.0%
GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT#3 · 10,224 sh$11.2K0.0%
Polar Asset Management Partners#4 · 600,000 sh$10.6K0.0%
TORONTO DOMINION BANK#5 · 607,455 sh$9.7K0.0%
Harraden Circle Investments#6 · 521,828 sh$8.6K0.0%
Clear Street Group#7 · 471,409 sh$7.7K0.0%
RIVERNORTH CAPITAL MANAGEMENT#8 · 250,000 sh$4.7K0.0%
WOLVERINE ASSET MANAGEMENT#9 · 275,845 sh$4.5K0.0%
UBS Group AG#10 · 56,863 sh$3.3K+0.9%
D. E. Shaw#11 · 200,000 sh$3.3K0.0%
PERISCOPE CAPITAL#12 · 124,900 sh$2.0K0.0%
StoneX Group#13 · 13,534 sh$247.00New

Source: Form 13F-HR filings on SEC EDGAR, Q2 2026. Values are as reported by each manager at quarter end. “% of portfolio” is the position’s share of the manager’s total reported 13F value for the same quarter. “New” means the manager filed a 13F for Q1 2026 without this position; a dash means no comparison is available. Where a manager’s own filing is internally inconsistent its value is withheld and it is listed last. 13F data shows reported holdings, not recommendations.